A bitter High Court dispute has broken out concerning future neighbours over the development of the wall in a coastal web-site inside a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which has captivated national consideration following an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed household residence at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of arranging breaches, environmental worries, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Occasions posting about René Collier as well as the Irish Instances write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a neighborhood disagreement has evolved right into a remarkably publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above development works at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, find to create their family members household. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, in which growth pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of set up residents. In accordance with the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying constructed by their prospective neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted under setting up permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those citizens of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their scheduling permission by developing a wall outside of the boundaries in their web-site, bringing about an encroachment with a Specific Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, as a result parts are subject to rigid controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have Long lasting ecological repercussions, significantly inside of a sensitive coastal environment like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach of their preparing authorization, and say the wall, which is partly crafted, is in the proper posture. Their lawful group has characterised the action as an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful improvement. The pair accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding as a way to preserve their check out, an allegation that's been recurring in court and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal planning disputes, the place views of The ocean are equally hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic efforts via the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In keeping with sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Situations. In a single account, Rene Collier waded as a result of midsection-significant drinking water through a storm to photograph the location Irish Occasions, an image that has considering the fact that come to be emblematic with the intensity of the dispute. These actions were not just symbolic; they were being intended to Collect Visible proof in the wall’s placement relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site with the sea Irish Moments noted, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the water all through serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm drinking water to photograph the site became Probably the most striking descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations report about accountant Paul Feely noted that this kind of actions ended up cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall prolonged into an area afflicted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument which the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up covered in detail via the countrywide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 turned extensively searched phrases as audience sought to grasp the track record and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court heard additional submissions on regardless of whether interim orders must be granted to halt building pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital moment from the authorized timeline.
On the Main in the dispute is usually a disagreement over boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve that the wall, as constructed, goes further than what was authorised and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has become described as meticulous in his assessment of scheduling paperwork, maps, and situations hooked up to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their action is enthusiastic by problem for environmental protection and adherence to setting up legislation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal look at, insisting rather that it's about ensuring that growth at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological limitations. In René Collier affidavits, they've got described their long-standing relationship to the realm and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a pair only trying to produce a loved ones house in accordance Using the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches with a Particular Space of Conservation and say that every one functions have been performed dependant on Qualified advice and accredited designs. Their legal professionals have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, like getting into the sea during a storm, never alter the underlying info.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how setting up disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute above design of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description for a scenario that a lot of observers see as more and more typical. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation amongst private land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is now far more contentious.
The Irish Occasions short article about René Collier noted that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved with local advocacy on preparing and environmental concerns, while not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Periods article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from really unique Experienced backgrounds can discover them selves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, became synonymous with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-high h2o during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Times and René Collier waded through waistline-higher drinking water through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared frequently in protection, reflecting equally the physical actuality of your coastline as well as the symbolic character in the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an abnormal approach.
As being the High Court proceedings continue, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom will have to establish if the wall as crafted complies with setting up permission and no matter if any encroachment right into a Distinctive Region of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and organizing problems. However the human aspect continues to be central: neighbours who should live together with one another prolonged after the legal fees are already compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development operates at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, although the implications of the situation lengthen further than that deal with. For planners, developers, and citizens alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the value of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. Furthermore, it underscores how immediately a local disagreement can escalate when elementary issues for instance environmental safety and home legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a spot of natural magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre from the dispute stands partly designed, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized questions. No matter if it will eventually be altered, eliminated, or concluded as prepared will rely on the court’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will very likely continue on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to Probably the most intently watched planning disputes in north Dublin in recent times.